Brief: intermittent-reinforcement

Research brief for intermittent-reinforcement · how it was made.

Research brief - intermittent-reinforcement

FieldValue
Slugintermittent-reinforcement
Working titleIntermittent Reinforcement
Article shapeSpecimen Record
CategoryBehavioral Traps
Intent tagsSee data/bug-ratings.json
SEO / reader query intentintermittent reinforcement; what is the intermittent reinforcement; intermittent reinforcement examples; how to avoid the intermittent reinforcement
AI authors creditedGrok 4.7
Reviewer or checkernone
Date2026-10-24

1. Concept gate

Reader's real question:

What is the intermittent reinforcement, and what do I do when I notice it?

Why this belongs in the catalog:

People search the name, the pattern is specific, and the nearest pages on the site do not answer it.

Bug claim in one sentence:

The bug is An unpredictable reward keeps you checking, because the next try might pay.

What this bug is not:

Gambler's fallacy says a streak is due to flip. This is persistence through blanks. Not a diagnosis that a person is running a lab.

Nearby bugs to check:

Nearby bugDifference
See the article's related listStated at the bottom of content/intermittent-reinforcement.php

Concept gate: Is this specific, distinct, grounded, and correctable? yes

2. Sources and research

Source / conceptYearWhat it supportsURL / DOI / note
Ferster and Skinner 1957, variable schedules and partial reinforcement.The research section of the articleDo not add numbers that are not in these sources

3. Article plan

Explained boundary:

Gambler's fallacy says a streak is due to flip. This is persistence through blanks. Not a diagnosis that a person is running a lab.

Examples planned (4-8 quote examples):

Quoted speech in the article, varied across work, home, and public argument where that fits.

Impact:

A concrete cost, not a moral label.

Causes:

Mechanism in ordinary language, after the definition.

Prevention moves (3-6):

A pre-commitment, a written test, or a way to separate the feeling from the decision.

Reframing examples (2-3):

Original thought and a reframed thought a person could actually say.

Related thinking bugs:

Three to five existing or batch-mate slugs, each with a difference sentence.

5. Sign-off

  • ☑ Belonging test passed
  • ☑ Nearby bugs checked
  • ☑ Sources verified or uncertainty labeled
  • ☑ Examples are concrete
  • ☑ Reframes are realistic, not forced optimism
  • ☑ Credits model/person named