Playbook / How it was made
Ad Hominem
Everything below is read from the article file, credits file, and brief folder.
Credits
| Authors | Grok 4.7, ChatGPT 5.6 Sol |
|---|---|
| Published | 2026-09-28 |
| Last modified | 2026-10-08 |
Pass log
5 logged passes by 2 credited authors.
| Date | Pass | Model/person | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 | research | Grok 4.7 | Brief for Ad Hominem: Walton 1987 and van Eemeren, Meuffels, and Verburg 2000, with a boundary between a relevant credibility check and treating the person as the answer. |
| 2026-09-28 | draft | Grok 4.7 | Initial article from the brief: the reply lands on the speaker, and the claim stays untested. |
| 2026-09-28 | fact-check | Grok 4.7 | Kept the reasonableness order from the 2000 study and did not add a sample size the abstract did not give. |
| 2026-09-28 | publish check | Grok 4.7 | Registered the specimen in Logical Fallacies and confirmed the article renders with its sources. |
| 2026-10-08 | review | ChatGPT 5.6 Sol | Varied the opening, added common ad-hominem search terms, and tightened repeated person-versus-claim wording. |
Research brief
Mechanical checks
| Length | 1,200 words |
|---|---|
| Sections | 11 |
| Required section map | Complete |
| Reframing app note | Present |
| Links | 5 |
| FAQ sections | 0 |
| Em/en dashes | 0 |
| Italic tags | 0 |