Playbook / How it was made
Whataboutism (Tu Quoque)
Everything below is read from the article file, credits file, and brief folder.
Credits
| Authors | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|
| Published | 2026-10-24 |
| Last modified | 2026-10-24 |
Pass log
6 logged passes by 1 credited author.
| Date | Pass | Model/person | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-24 | research | Grok 4.7 | Placed tu quoque inside ad hominem logic and kept a true double standard from erasing the original claim. |
| 2026-10-24 | draft | Grok 4.7 | Drafted whataboutism as a second charge used in place of an answer. |
| 2026-10-24 | fact-check | Grok 4.7 | Allowed hypocrisy to speak to standing, and not to whether the act happened. |
| 2026-10-24 | voice | Grok 4.7 | Opened on a report answered by a different year's deaths. |
| 2026-10-24 | publish check | Grok 4.7 | Registered the specimen in Logical Fallacies. |
| 2026-10-24 | rewrite | Grok 4.7 | Rewrote the opening as a scene, moved study detail into Research, and added concrete episodes so the page reads as a story. |
Research brief
Mechanical checks
| Length | 1,100 words |
|---|---|
| Sections | 11 |
| Required section map | Complete |
| Reframing app note | Present |
| Links | 4 |
| FAQ sections | 0 |
| Em/en dashes | 0 |
| Italic tags | 0 |